#11
|
||||
|
||||
I watched a few youtube videos about Underwater recently. I think because they reviewed other stuff so I was curious. Those videos also pointed out how Alien handled the characters versus Underwater. Which is a valid claim. But I think you also have to understand modern audiences that seem to want something to blow up every 10 or so minutes.
I think Underwater tried something different with the action right from the start and minimal character development. It's not the best with two characters that I mentioned in my review. Also with the main character's decision at the end. But there is an alternate better ending. And I think the director and studio should have overwritten the actor on that theatrical ending. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
SPOILERS
Quote:
What did the video review say about how Underwater handled the characters vs Alien? got a link, id be interested in checking that out. What was the main characters decision at the end? You mean punching that chic and sending her up in the last pod, i think? So what happened in the alternate ending version? Is that on youtube? The character development in Alien was fun. Character development shouldn't be a chore. Shouldn't feel like a chore. Almost all fiction films are about the characters. Great, interesting, suspenseful, scary story subject matter, and impressive visuals, are a wonderful plus for a film, but it's about the characters. I thought character development in Underwater seemed choreful... to invent a word. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I love character development. That's what makes a good movie. You have to care about the characters. Believe they are real. Not just videogame characters or people that can survive anything. But I do get the attempt in Underwater. Another person on the HorrorDVD forum compared it to a roller coaster ride. I guess because it starts fast and only has a few slow points. Here are all the videos I watched on Underwater. The Alien one first. |
|
|