Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror.com Lobby > Horror.com General Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:34 AM
_____V_____'s Avatar
_____V_____ _____V_____ is offline
For Vendetta
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 31,677
The Human Centipede II rejected by BBFC!

No UK release for the horror sequel

06 June 2011 | Source: BBFC


Last year's The Human Centipede was mad, bad and really quite grotesque. But this year's sequel, imaginatively called The Human Centipede II, has been rejected by the British Board of Film Classification on the basis that it is "sexually violent and potentially obscene".

This means that the DVD cannot be legally supplied anywhere in the UK.

The original film was released, uncut, as an 18 last year. This one, however, apparently has "unacceptable material" throughout which cannot be remedied with cuts. The filmmakers have six weeks in which to appeal against the decision.

It's worth noting, before we get all up in arms, that this is a relatively rare decision for the BBFC, who outlined their reasons at some length and stressed that the full Board was in on this one. The full reasoning is given below in the link - but if you're of a sensitive disposition even this may be rather unpleasant.

http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=31162
__________________
"If you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:44 AM
Freak's Avatar
Freak Freak is offline
HDC Resident Serial Killa
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Carnivale
Posts: 7,262
Send a message via Yahoo to Freak
I can't say that I'm to upset about this. The first was utterly stupid and over hyped.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:50 AM
roshiq's Avatar
roshiq roshiq is offline
Pirate of Bengal

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 8,691
The only way left for them is now a straight torrent release like The Tunnel. :D
__________________
@Letterboxd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:52 AM
TheWickerFan's Avatar
TheWickerFan TheWickerFan is offline
Whip In My Valise
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,647
*Sigh* The filmmakers will probably end up editing it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:55 AM
ferretchucker's Avatar
ferretchucker ferretchucker is offline
Ziggy Played Guitar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Just to the left of nowhe
Posts: 10,578
Send a message via MSN to ferretchucker Send a message via Skype™ to ferretchucker
Like it will really stop people. In this day and age, the internet is God. And the BBFC have very little control over that.

To be honest, I don't think it's bad news either way. Really couldn't care less about the first. There are far sicker, more twisted films. This one just happened to get publicity.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:59 AM
The Villain's Avatar
The Villain The Villain is offline
Evil is Better

 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Your Nightmares
Posts: 6,693
The first one was terrible, i wish they would stop an American release of it as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2011, 11:54 AM
neverending's Avatar
neverending neverending is offline
Cranky

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,416
Wow... people supporting censorship. Incredible.
__________________
Lee Widener, Author Website

Cartoon Artwork, Underground Art, Other Weird Stuff
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2011, 01:34 PM
Ferox13's Avatar
Ferox13 Ferox13 is offline
Innsmouth Swim Team Coach


 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by neverending View Post
Wow... people supporting censorship. Incredible.
For sure. It doesn't matter the quality of the film - a group of adults deciding what is fit for the majority of people to watch isn't right.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2011, 01:39 PM
The Villain's Avatar
The Villain The Villain is offline
Evil is Better

 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Your Nightmares
Posts: 6,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferox13 View Post
For sure. It doesn't matter the quality of the film - a group of adults deciding what is fit for the majority of people to watch isn't right.
Hey i dont care about the so called gruesomeness of the movie (for the record, i didnt think the first one was as brutal as people make it out to be) I just think its a terrible movie. That being said, you're right. Censorship of this nature isn't right.

Also just so everyone knows, my comment before was just a joke. I don't want to see the movie but i can just choose not to watch it, i dont need it be banned. Also movies getting censored and banned only makes people want to watch it more so its pointless anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2011, 03:19 PM
Elvis_Christ's Avatar
Elvis_Christ Elvis_Christ is offline
Misanthrope


 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,479
Damn, this will almost certainly be the same case for NZ and Australia then. Not that it'll stop me seeing it of course and if I want to buy it I'll hopefully be able to sneak a R1 release onto my shelf.

The original was a tad underwhelming but I enjoyed it especially for Dieter Laser performance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _____V_____ View Post
this is a relatively rare decision for the BBFC
:confused: really? These guys have been heavy handed for decades if I'm not mistaking?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:24 AM.