#11  
Old 01-16-2016, 12:34 AM
Ferox13's Avatar
Ferox13 Ferox13 is offline
Innsmouth Swim Team Coach


 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,975
Yeah - I have voiced it here many times. Stupid term created by the media it condemn and pigeon hole Horror/exploitation films..

Giganticface pretty much brings up all my points too, though I think the term is meant to be like porn in that the films are just an excuse to string together violent,torture scenes in the same way porn does with sex (ie the plot is uninteresting or non existent). The term doesn't mean torture that sexually excites (like hardcore BDSM etc).

With that in mind (as I have said before) we need to start calling comedies 'Chuckle Porn)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-17-2016, 01:08 AM
bats's Avatar
bats bats is offline
Hellraiser
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: earth
Posts: 31
i use the term and i think it makes sense in some cases. i think the term porn, usually used of a suffix on the internet has become a way of describing anything kind of gratuitous (like food porn, shoe porn, whatever else the internet has decided to call porn) so if the main focus of a movie is some one being tortured i would call it torture porn and that doesn't really mean it's a bad movie even though that is a derogatory term. if when i hear people talking about the move they mainly talk about the gore and the violence not the plot or characters i feel that it is fair to call it torture porn. i know i might sound like a prick and i am not trying to but i don't think it's really so bad to call something torture porn.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-17-2016, 07:11 AM
Ferox13's Avatar
Ferox13 Ferox13 is offline
Innsmouth Swim Team Coach


 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,975
Reading Steve Jones book on the subject a the moment:

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-17-2016, 11:31 AM
Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! is offline
"Wrong one, bitch!"
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Nope, I agree with the term "torture porn", it has no place in horror either. It's just another genre of exploitation movies. Take a look at the Japanese torture porn flick Grotesque for instance.. it has no substance. It's just a mindless torture porn movie, which is why I refuse to watch it. I know how it starts and how it ends thanks to Wikipedia, and I'm glad I didn't waste 72 minutes of my time on it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-17-2016, 12:15 PM
TheBossInTheWall's Avatar
TheBossInTheWall TheBossInTheWall is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! View Post
Nope, I agree with the term "torture porn", it has no place in horror either. It's just another genre of exploitation movies. Take a look at the Japanese torture porn flick Grotesque for instance.. it has no substance. It's just a mindless torture porn movie, which is why I refuse to watch it. I know how it starts and how it ends thanks to Wikipedia, and I'm glad I didn't waste 72 minutes of my time on it.
That's basically how I feel about most of it. A film like Saw is an exception. A very quality film. Intense, acted superbly, and not just about blood and guts.

"But these films have a plot!" So can sex porn films. :P
__________________
Faux News, telling you what you think you already know!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-17-2016, 12:28 PM
Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! is offline
"Wrong one, bitch!"
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBossInTheWall View Post
That's basically how I feel about most of it. A film like Saw is an exception. A very quality film. Intense, acted superbly, and not just about blood and guts.

"But these films have a plot!" So can sex porn films. :P
I haven't seen Saw yet, but I have seen some, if not all, of the sequels. I agree that the original Saw isn't really a torture porn movie, mostly because, iirc, the two characters aren't being forced to make a choice. I mean, technically they are being forced to make a choice, but I mean, without a "you have 60 seconds, otherwise you will die" kind of thing. The sequels however, I would classify as torture porn movies.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-19-2016, 07:23 AM
Ferox13's Avatar
Ferox13 Ferox13 is offline
Innsmouth Swim Team Coach


 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! View Post
Nope, I agree with the term "torture porn", it has no place in horror either.
I think Saw and Hostel - probably the most famous of the films branded with that title very much belong in horror genre. They are also 2 films that I enjoyed..Same goes for some of the French New Wave that has been labeled Torture Porn - titles like Haute Tension, Inside, Martyrs and Frontier(s).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-19-2016, 05:30 PM
Sculpt's Avatar
Sculpt Sculpt is offline
ventricle


 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA, IL
Posts: 6,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giganticface View Post
The term torture porn is originally a derogatory term used to backhandedly classify movies centered on torture, that appear to have no merit other than to provide titillation for people who find "people getting tortured" titillating. The first two Guinea Pig films are valid examples, but Hostel is the film considered to have birthed the genre. This is a mistake since the film is not really a torture porn film, and certainly wouldn't have been the first if it were one. The Saw franchise is also mistakenly considered to be originators of the subgenre, mostly starting with Saw II. Both examples are poor because the scenes containing torture, although debatably exploitative, are important elements of a larger storyline.

I've always thought it's a stupid term, and one I refuse to use. My biggest beef is that pornography is real, in the sense that people are really having sex. "Torture porn" is fake. Everyone is acting. No one is getting tortured for real. But people still draw the parallel between getting excited about people having sex, and the same for people "getting tortured." It implies that those who might enjoy a film like Guinea Pig ought to feel some shame. By extension and misuse, it says the same about people who enjoy a Hostel or Saw movie.

Another major issue I have with the term is that it's misleading, and many people think it refers to films containing liberal amounts of torture and sex. If that were actually true of the films it's used to describe, it wouldn't be such a bad term. However, that's not the case, and this ends up grossly misrepresenting these films and the subgenre.

I for one find a bit of enjoyment in some true torture porn films, but admittedly they are pure spectacle and are hard to take seriously because they have no story. It's merely interesting for the special effects, or the occasional inducing of squeamishness. Examples include Guinea Pig (1, 2, and American), Grotesque, The Bunny Game and August Underground. All those films are actually pretty terrible.

On the other hand, I found the concept in Hostel very horrifying when I first saw it, and wondered if that type of killing business could be real. It's not the greatest film, but has some other fun stuff in it, like the gangs of children who extort candy from passers by, and feeds our fear of being stranded in a war-turn country full of desperate people. Hostel 2 was maybe even more interesting with the story that followed the two men who were customers of the killing service, one of which struggles with being conflicted. These films are not meritless torture spectacles, and whether you like them or not, they employ actual storytelling.

I also admit I like the Saw franchise, but those films can be a bit uneven, are primarily crime thrillers, resemble a soap opera in the way each film continues from the last, and are nearly satirical in the way each film formulaically pulls a twist at the end. Still, for me, pretty fun, and certainly not just because of all that mindless torture.

The popularity of those two franchises spawned a wave of copycats, most of which were cheap and failed to tell a compelling story. In this sense, Saw and Hostel did in fact create a subgenre. This caused the term torture porn to become commonplace, and even more incorrectly applied, as reviewers started classifying films like The Devil's Rejects, Wolf Creek and Inside by the term. I even heard one podcast (which I enjoy and respect) classify The Descent that way. Baffling.

So anyway, I hate the term. When I defined the genres for Screambox I refused to use it, even though it was suggested by staff. I find it misleading, lazy and harmful to our genre and I just wish it would go away.
Well said, Gigan.

I like the term. And it was certainly originally a derogatory term. Basically still is, but widely miss-used now.

There are very few films that have long and frequent scenes of torture... which is financially wise, because there aren't many who'd want to see it.

Kills, gore and suspense aren't torture. An antagonist forcing anguish on a character is torture, but cinematic suspense isn't . Saw, as an example, is certainly not torture porn. People who want to insult the Saw genre market and audience, love to call it torture porn.

And for it to be torture porn, all scenes leading up to the long and frequent torture scenes would need to be basically without story and cinematic merit.

I would call a The Girl Next Door (2007) torture porn, with all negativity intact. Based on a true story, the production was certainly a crime against the child actors involved. A cinematic dramatization was unnecessary, where a documentary could fulfill any public awareness purpose, if there is one. This film as entertainment was a travesty.
__________________
.
.
.
.


Last edited by Sculpt; 05-20-2016 at 04:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-20-2016, 02:13 AM
Ferox13's Avatar
Ferox13 Ferox13 is offline
Innsmouth Swim Team Coach


 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sculpt View Post
Saw, as an example, is certainly not torture porn. People who want to insult the Saw genre market and audience, love to call it torture porn.
The thing is that the media created the term for Saw and Hostel. But you are right in thinking that the term doesn't fit these films. And of course, as the term became popular films began to be made to deliberately fit the term Torture Porn and to cash in on it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-20-2016, 12:35 PM
Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! Kill Me, Freddy Krueger! is offline
"Wrong one, bitch!"
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferox13 View Post
I think Saw and Hostel - probably the most famous of the films branded with that title very much belong in horror genre. They are also 2 films that I enjoyed..Same goes for some of the French New Wave that has been labeled Torture Porn - titles like Haute Tension, Inside, Martyrs and Frontier(s).
I recently saw Haute Tension, A L'interieur, Martyrs and Frontier(s), but I wouldn't call them torture porn myself, but I can see why other people would label them like that, aside from Haute Tension. To me, that's just a slasher.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.