I work on movie marketing... I'm very intimate with a number of the more mainstream titles on that list.

year one was the worst movie i've seen in a lot of years.

transformers 2 wasnt far behind.


how is it possible to make a movie about giant robots that dull ?

Wow, I haven't even heard of a lot of the movies on that list.

I liked Battlefield Earth. I genuinely enjoyed it. I would like for there to be a sequel. I'm being serious.

Lost Souls was shockingly bad to be so awesome looking.

I only glimpsed the list, but I think Taking Lives should be on it. Such a cool premise raped to death by Angelina Jolie's retarded acting and a stoopid script.

Soroity Row, easily. Everything thats wrong with the genre in one movie.

that list was beyond terrible..

Really? I thought Strange Wilderness was funny enough and Serving Sara made me laugh at parts.

I do agree with Glitter, HotD, and Fear(DOT)Com but this list is missing some pretty epic movie fails, such as:

Creep Show 3
Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus
Antichrist
...just to name a couple.

Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus was loads of fun - what else could you expect from a title like that..

Antichrist was ok-ish - far from the worst of the decade.

That film was 110% pure monkey-shit! It completely lacked ANYTHING of value... It's entire purpose was to make the audience say "Ewww!" and that's it. Two Girls, One Cup achieved the same goal in 3minutes of film and 1/2000th the budget... Antichrist is a testament to how idiotic the world's film-student has become. I rate Necromantik higher than I do that shamble.

....Female castration?!?! That's where the genre has gone, eh? Pathetic....

I honestly didn't expect too damn much from that movie, and realized it would be a sub-par experience, but that still doesn't save it from sucking. It's good for a laugh... but sadly it's the laugh of pity.

I like Nekromantik and I wouldn't really consider Antichrist a 'genre' film.

As for no redeeming values at all - i would definally say thecinematography was excellent in parts (though over done in others) and I though William Defoe was great in it.

I really can't understand that this film has the same depth as a Scatological Porn film (though I must admit to not having see the film you named)

I am a Willem Defoe fan, but why he took this part is beyond me... This movie fakes artistic depth by grotesque violence as the vehicle. It's a juvenile approach at creating a film with "meaning"...
I wish I was able to find something worth enjoying about it, like you did. :(
I would view it again, but the images are still fresh on my mind... too fresh to be precise.