...agreed!

.....just so long as you understand that 28 Days Later, while a good movie, was NOT a zombie movie

It was a Rage induced adrenaline Zombie thingy... I just as soon call it a zombie movie over a slasher movie any time...:D

here we go again....

ok, the definition of ZOMBIE is the LIVING DEAD.....so, that said, one has to be DEAD before one can be a zombie, yes?

The "infected" in 28 days later were just that and nothing more..INFECTED....they were not dead, undead, or otherwise.

It was a great movie, I liked it, good plot and idea behind it.

It just was NOT a zombie movie

You sure? :D

Just fucking with you :)

It may be interesting, but i would definately miss Boyd's touch.

Yikes!! NOOOO!!! Okay, this is one of those films that works great by itself and will be destroyed if a sequel is made. I mean, Lucas totally fucked up the Star Wars trilogy when he started with the new shit (IMO). But then again, if the story is intelligent and contributes something to the first film, then it might be okay. I just can't think of anything more that needs to be done with that story and its characters.

oh is this one not gonna suck or what

Any buzz on what the story might be about?

I can't wiat. It seems promsing, but is the sequel going to take place in the U.S.?
Because that would suck to take the series out of Britain.

I just recently read
 

I just recently read in a mag that it probably will take place in the U.S. (I HOPE NOT!), since at the end of the first film a plane picks them up. And apparently it's a U.S. one and then it's gonna spread all over the U.S. I think New York

i pretty much agree with everybody on this one. I liked the first one, but dont know about the 2nd one, oh well i would watch it anyways..