On a different matter, the article is funny. The author of the article is fully inserted in their article. Hard to find straight up news these days.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3948329.stm
First funny thing is the wording evoking genetic based beliefs, or pre-birth spirit-being fully developed personal identity. Evoking a notion familiar in homosexual precepts: the author writes,
Quote:
According to the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Cranmer realised he was a Satanist nine years ago.
|
&
Quote:
He said: "I then read more and more and came to realise I'd always been a Satanist, just simply never knew."
|
It's evoking arguments that he was born a Satanist. That at his most elemental core, if everything else was boiled away, he was a Satanist. He didn't choose it, & he could never be anything else.
It's flowery & poetic, but if you apply that to a host of other like things, such as one's belief that they were 'born a murderer', or was born always having to have the last word, etc. It backhandedly asserts there is no freedom of conscious. No one can have a change of mind or heart. I think it a silly & dangerous notion.
Really, whether a conscious or unconscious act, the wording & argument is designed to mean "I'm declaring I believe this, & do not try to change my mind." Adults are free to assert that. The whole "I was always a believer of these 100 items" argument seems a shifty, if not adolescent, way to go about saying, 'don't try to change my mind'.
Then the author immediately serves up a pseudo Straw Man Argument (The author attacks an argument different from (and weaker than) the opposition's best argument.) The author presents the obvious hypocritical ravings of someone who is not involved deciding policy... not a Navy spokesman, not a member of Parliament, but "
Former Tory minister Ann Widdecombe".
Ann "helpfully" says, "Obviously the private beliefs of individuals anywhere, including the armed forces, are their own affair" & then goes on to say, "Satanism is wrong.", "God himself gives free will, but I would like to think that if somebody applied to the Navy and said they were a Satanist today it would raise its eyebrows somewhat.", & "The Navy should not permit Satanist practices on board its ships." Which basically means, everyone has the right to their own beliefs, but if I think they're wrong, that person shouldn't be allowed to work, nor practice their beliefs.
So, if you disagree with Ann, then it's checkmate for the author's beliefs. ::big grin::
Anyway, a spokesman for the Royal Navy said: "We are an equal opportunities employer and we don't stop anybody from having their own religious values." As I stated in my previous post, I believe in freedom of conscience & religion -- it's just the article is really funny, & not in a good way.