Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Directors cut vs "theatrical" version (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14006)

slasherman 04-09-2005 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpropain
How in the hell can you like part 3 better than 2???:confused:

I mean don't get me wrong I liked part 3 but come on man part 2 has fucking Bill Mosely in it and Jim Siedow.

like I said to much comedy...number 3 has less budget and acting..but more serious horror

barbra 04-09-2005 06:22 PM

DC of aliens3 was better for the simple reason that it showed the alien coming from a dog hince its bone structure.
the dc of legend was super weird with funny music and some added scence that really weren't significant, like a man sitting in the window at the peasent woman's house.
oh yeah, and I couldn't watch natural born killers any other way

alkytrio666 04-28-2005 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ItsAlive75
Exorcist: Version You've Never Seen

Best 11 extra minutes ever

Which scenes were the extra ones in that? Was one of them the "crab-walk down the stairs, puking blood" scene? I've only seen "The Version You've Never Seen", so someone fill me in on which scenes were added.

Elvis_Christ 04-28-2005 05:43 PM

The Crab walk, some extra shit when Regan's at the doctor's and some other shit I can't really remember.

crippler666 08-05-2005 03:59 PM

The director's cut of Alien 3 is the biggest improvement ever.

In it the improvements was made to plot, tension and action. It finally made sense.

But why did they cut nearly 45mins of footage in the first place?

Festered 10-22-2008 03:23 PM

A good case for theatrical versions is Sam Peckinpah. Many of his films meander when restored to the director's vision. Fortunately, the inclusions in his masterpiece The Wild Bunch, were so minor, that they were barely noticeable(unnecessary flashbacks). But Major Dundee and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid really get messed up in restoration. Sam never knew when to apply the breaks, and his ego never permitted himself cuts. And one of the main reason's for his ostracism from the Studio system.

alkytrio666 10-22-2008 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Festered (Post 747027)
A good case for theatrical versions is Sam Peckinpah. Many of his films meander when restored to the director's vision. Fortunately, the inclusions in his masterpiece The Wild Bunch, were so minor, that they were barely noticeable(unnecessary flashbacks). But Major Dundee and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid really get messed up in restoration. Sam never knew when to apply the breaks, and his ego never permitted himself cuts. And one of the main reason's for his ostracism from the Studio system.

Wow! Old thread!

Leone, on the other hand, has improved DCs.
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is even better in its uncut form, and so is Duck, You Sucker.

Festered 10-22-2008 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alkytrio666 (Post 747039)
Wow! Old thread!

Leone, on the other hand, has improved DCs.
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is even better in its uncut form, and so is Duck, You Sucker.

Sucker is excellent in the new version. All the unanswered questions(due to the usual butchering by US editors) are gone, and Leone's real intentions are apparent. The set looks better than ever.

illdojo 10-23-2008 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alkytrio666 (Post 747039)
Wow! Old thread!

Leone, on the other hand, has improved DCs.
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is even better in its uncut form.

Definitely....The film as aged soooo well.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.