nothing funnier (and i do it myself) than spelling dumb, stupid, idiot, or retard wrong in a post when you're pissed at someone :p

Erm...:o

I guess it is kinda funny though:p

you said it mate, learn to sepll poepel!!!!

im sry i dont spell good i hate english class i dont see why i have to talk right on the net. not like im getting marks for how i type

yes the count did have a deep accent, and while lugosi got it across very well, it didn't exactly require much acting on his part, it was how he spoke anyway, and he had to learn his lines pheonetically which just gave him a deeper accent on the film.

back to max shreck however, of course he had no lines to speak in those days, but he still gives a performance which has lasted years and easily scares as much as lugosi.

surely another reason which shows shreck really was the better actor??

Rather an odd and unconvincing argument, don't you think?

Now you're not judging just the result but what it took to achieve them -- a rather dubious proposition at best. Whether Lugosi's accent took lots of effort or none at all is immaterial to our enjoyment of the performance.

As for Shreck being the better actor, I frankly find the assertion silly. His "performance" consists of walking around in the rat makeup.

Ultimately, Shreck and NOSFERATU offer a very simple sort of scare -- Ooh, it's ugly!

The more seductive nature of Lugosi's Dracula is much more sophisticated.

shrek was a funny movie:D

Yeah, almost as funny as NOSFERATU!

Have you read Dracula?

Gee, I had hoped the answer to that question would be clear from my previous posts in this thread. I guess I'm not trying hard enough.