...it didnt happend on these occasions...

Scream 3
NOES 3 (like you said)
Hellraiser 3 (number 2 was to much)
Back to the future 3 ( not horror ...but)

...more to come

I was just going by what I personally thought of the movies. Though, I may be taking Child's Play 3 off of my list since I seem to enjoy watching part 2 a helluva lot more. Each time I watch it I'm seldomy entertain and I always find something to keep me interested each watch. Child's Play 3 is starting to get stale. I still like it, but just not as much as I seem to be likeing part 2. FACTOID: Both Child's Play 2 and Child's Play 3 have received 3 out of 5 stars.

I really enjoyed the first half of JC #1, but then it kept on getting worse and worse. The kids were dumb as hell (we just saw a guy dump what looks like bodies into a hole, let's go back and check it out). Then he sprouted wings and then the movie ended so abruptly. It started off sooo promising. I have to say that the second was at least not disappointing. I knew going in what I was going to see. If a #3 comes out, I will definitely wait for it to come out on DVD, if it doesn't go staight to video.

Jeepers Creepers 3 ????
 

Okay, I'm perplexed.... What the hell is this?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...320sodeb34.jpg


Did someone just photoshop their own JC3 DVD or is this film already out in Europe?

No info on imdb, minimal info turned up through searching, the main message was that production started and was suspended due to funding issues...

Hmpf! Weird.....



I wonder this picture came from then. Maybe a promotional thing for the marketing department or something....


If anything on this is accurate, (Not sure if it is completely made up or what...) I think it would be interesting to see a female Creeper.

The cover itself is very obviously done by someone in photoshop, without much know-how of the program. It's a rather shitty cover, and no studio would EVER approve it. Half of the things on it don't even make sense, or are just plain stupid.

I'd be willing to say that the front image is not from the film either. It looks sort of drawn, and not that greatly designed for a creeper.

although i guess there is a practical reason for it (honing the photoshop skills - and exposure for your abilities) the new fanboy fad of creating your own made up posters (and trailers) - makes you wonder sometimes why they just dont channel their imagination and talents into making the actual goddamn film.

Another giveaway clue:

Look in the bottom left hand corner of what would be the front cover.

"Un film de sodeh-34" (Should be "par", not "de")

Translated:

"A film of sodeh-34"

Hmm...cant think of many directors that go by a screenname:rolleyes:

Sorry to rain on your parade, but the the mention is correct by all means.

"A film by" translates into "Un film de" in French, while "Filmed by" would translate into "Filmé par". "Un film par" would not be correct under any circumstance. And I certainly know what I am talking about, since I am French (or French-Canadian if you prefer), AND a translator.

Now, the guy's name, well that is quite another story :D