3 men and a baby
 

I watched this yesterday, aswell as 'Three men and a little lady'.....for the first time in about 10 years.



I've come to the conclusion that I much prefer 80's films. Both films are essentially, a big pile of shit. But its good shit.



The only problem I have, is why did they have to turn Tom Selleck into such a big poof in the sequel? He was da man in the first one. Even his moustache couldn't stop him becoming a pathetic, blubbering mess in the second one. She isnt even that good looking Tom.


And the mother is such a biatch. The guys should have bumped her off ages ago. What a ho. And you know she's secretly shagging Steve in her lunch hour. Plus how come Tom and Steve never had a go at Ted for the heroin stash in the first film? And how come Steve isn't given a better role in the sequel?


Best ending to a film ever - Ted's face when he catches the bouqet at the end of the sequel.




Mozza

sounds like a VERY illegal porno...

You'd be the one to know "baby-molesting murderbot". :D

did you see the 1st film of this
where they reckon they could see a ghostly figure in it..of some kid by a red curtain ??

cardboard cutout left on set during filming...

that wasn't real, it was a cardboard cutout

My problem here is the discussion of Three Men and a Baby and Three Men and a Little Lady at Horror.com. I mean, it's a little weird, and a tad bit inappropriate. Do you have some horror movie experiences that you'd like to discuss? That's what kind of protocol we try to maintain, although in the general forum things can range from the ridiculous to riotously funny quips and such.

Or in other words 'What the fuck?'

It was based on a french comedy wasn't it? Three Men and a Cradle or some such shit?

Three men and a bagel.

A sequal to the movie Three Men and a Baby... horror at its best.

and we should give a fuck... why?

:confused:

^^ LMAO!

A Pervert and Two Beagels :)