Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Hide and Creep..Dont waste your time. (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17491)

Zombee 08-29-2005 01:08 PM

Hide and Creep..Dont waste your time.
 
This zombie flic was baaaaaaaaaad. In a negative way. These guys had the nerve to say it was better than Shaun of the Dead. Please do not waste your time or money on this.

Yellow Jacket 08-29-2005 01:11 PM

I wish you would've said this a month ago before mI seen it. I totally agree with you. It wasn't funny, I didn't like any of the characters (except for the video store guy) and thought the acting was horribly bad. Better than Shaun of the Dead my ass!!! :mad:

Zombee 08-29-2005 01:18 PM

I agree about the acting.. it was really shitty. The story line could have been very funny with better acting and little bit bigger budget. The whole backwoods booger eating hick town invasion of zombies could make for a very cool zombie flic.

Yellow Jacket 08-29-2005 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Zombee
I agree about the acting.. it was really shitty. The story line could have been very funny with better acting and little bit bigger budget. The whole backwoods booger eating hick town invasion of zombies could make for a very cool zombie flic.
True! Another complaint of mine's would be that I'm curious as to why they had to spoof a zombie flick. IT WAS ALREADY DONE!!! Do something else for once!

noctuary 08-29-2005 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket
True! Another complaint of mine's would be that I'm curious as to why they had to spoof a zombie flick. IT WAS ALREADY DONE!!! Do something else for once!
I figure they were probably just trying to capitalize on Shaun of the Dead's success. Well, that and that they don't have an original bone in their bodies. And to say that it was better... Not bloody likely.

Yellow Jacket 08-29-2005 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by noctuary
I figure they were probably just trying to capitalize on Shaun of the Dead's success. Well, that and that they don't have an original bone in their bodies. And to say that it was better... Not bloody likely.
True, but it wasn't that smart if you ask me. I mean, Shaun of the Dead was a huge hit in the UK. Then it comes down to the States and makes it into theaters and does good. So, why would you try to capitalize on it if you're making a direct-to-video movie? It's pretty dumb IMO.

noctuary 08-29-2005 08:12 PM

Oh, I definitely agree. It wasn't a very smart move. However... these are rip-off artists we're talking about here. "Smart" is not the word I'd use to describe them.

Yellow Jacket 08-29-2005 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by noctuary
Oh, I definitely agree. It wasn't a very smart move. However... these are rip-off artists we're talking about here. "Smart" is not the word I'd use to describe them.
Another true statement! Should've thought before I spoke.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.