Okay, this guy has officially pissed me off!
 

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bs...s-of-all-time/

:mad:

Now where the hell did I put my shotgun...

Calling Ridley Scott alone overrated is bad enougn but HITCHCOCK?!


And from this article it's all too clear which side of the political compass he is on.

*Grabs a torch and pitchfork*

Why doesn't this fucktard wanna box his critics like Uwe Boll did? I'm sure people would be lining up to put this clown on his ass.

Those are all poop nuts comments. I assume him thinks him can do better :confused::confused::confused:

Seems like a successful troll to me.

I care about the status of Woody Allen's penis, so I deem the rest of his blog pure speculation!

who cares what some nobody i've never heard of says.

controvercy for the sake of being controvercial isnt in the least bit interesting.

This guy is a complete and utter douche. But I do agree about Requiem for a Dream. It was loud, ugly and nihilistic and not in the cool Abel Ferrara way. Woody Allen is the cinematic broken clock, right twice a day and almost by coincidence. Also, Hitchcock's psychology is halfassed, but realism isn't a priority for him. I actually agree with William Friedkin when he says that Hitchcock's strength is in making you believe stories that basically make no sense. Watching Vertigo, I see him not as a polished writer of suspense, but as a man that learned a thing or two from Lewton and Dreyer. This list is bullshit. Where's Goddard? Where's Fellini? (Two great films and a lot of trpe). Where's Spielberg? Where's ORSON FUCKING WELLES?

i think urgeok is a dried up hack who has only made on good post and that was largely by accident - since then his posts have been half-baked, poorly conceived and lacklustre.

(let the controversy begin!!)


:D

Sounds about right to me..