Quote:
Originally posted by PR3SSUR3
My credible source is the NCC.
You could have said millions of rogue Muslims is still not a disproportionate amount of killers within one movement. However it is difficult to determine either way since there are not exactly many areas of life to compare portions of which that go bad on this large a scale. Race, perhaps, but that is hardly a lifestyle choice - and the behaviour of many within is of course often dictated by religion once again. Social movements do not inflict the same terror, political movements are inflicted upon the masses by the elite of the group.
So while two different people might well each cite religion and Dawn of the Dead as their influence to commit murder, it is most unlikely that as the number of committed members increases the number of atrocities increases the same between them. More people are always going to kill in the name of religion, or do you not think so for sure because there are not quite as many violent film fans to survey? Religion breeds many, many self-serving nutters - violent cinema only a handful at best.
I've already given you my thoughts several times on your last paragraph. It is as neccessary as the morning cup of tea. It might be nice, and familiar, but I would echo Freud's analysis from a few posts ago.
|
Yes, you've given your thoughts several times, but you've yet to back them up. All you do is say "people don't need religion" and a handful of other things that you just stretch out to paragraph length. Although I will ask one question: Do you have any actual experience with religion, or just what you look up on the internet?