|
As a practicing empiricalist who has proved there is no God (argue if you will, prove otherwise) I would assert that since therefore The Bible has no relevance other than as a work of distorted facts and pure fiction then his comments regarding it are entirely wrong.
Therefore if Billy Graham is basing his advice on such a tome, his thoughts on this subject are completely redundant.
Speaking from the point of view of common sense, I would say he sounds chauvinistic for males while hiding behind religion.
I would also say there are tendencies - including within this thread - to refer to academic qualifications or alleged lack of them to pontificate or denounce thought. Remember that degrees and PHDs might indicate competent understanding of a particular subject, but they are not exhaustive and can sterilise and bottleneck ideas as the current curriculum sees fit.
__________________
|