BR, you already know that I, personally, think we should be able to say whatever we want. But since that's not really the debate at hand, I'll say this... If you, as the mod, feel like someone crosses a line then you , as the mod, should step in and, at your disgression, give them a warning or a banning, if warranted. Members should be allowed to voice a complaint to you and at that point you can scope it out and make a decision. But if the complaining member continues to harrass you in regards to your follow up, that should be grounds for banishment. Once you have rapped your moderatory gavel, that should be the end of it. If Dep should be banned for making fun of a guy who spammed the entire forum with total bullshit for a couple hours in a row one night because someone didn't like his recipe :rolleyes: , then I probably should be banned a couple hundred times over as well because I hit up almost every spammer that comes in here...
I guess what I'm saying is that I think everyone here trusts your disgression and if they don't, tough shit, because you're the moderator. Either they can get over it or go somewhere else. Maybe get rid of 'It Stops Now' and replace it with a 'Mods Have Discretionary Jurisdiction' thread...
|