Quote:
Originally Posted by neverending
As mentioned already- Price had previously appeared in Cask of Amontillado. He did a great job.
Hitchcock doing a period piece? His interest was strictly modern. I really doubt he'd be interested. Really doubt. Not to mention- there's no woman. Hitchcock needs a beautiful woman in a script. No backtracking- you didn't mention it, so you didn't intend it.
|
I did mention secondary characters and subplots being added. The core story revolves around 2 male leads though.
Quote:
Casting Lugosi? Difficult- he died in 1956.
Poorly researched, poorly thought out, IMO. Doesn't play to any of the strengths of Hitchcock, and casting dead actors would get you laughed out of the pitch meeting right away.
|
Ouch! Nailed me on that one and I even looked it up. Apparently I am dyslexic, retarded or just can't count.
Quote:
|
This will get low marks from me. Even lower for arguing with the judges.
|
Well then it's a good thing America is voting and not y-
*Ryan Veacrest leans over and whispers in bwind22's ear.*
Oh. Nevermind then.
Seriously though, I thought V said we were supposed to win over the judges but in looking back at the original rules I now see we're not supposed to challenge the judges integrity. Is that same thing as defending our answers?