|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#41
06-11-2011, 10:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=Fearonsarms;894471]...we had to wait till LAST year to get full uncut versions of Inferno and Deep Red...QUOTE]
So my copies of those movies, that are older than last year, aren't complete? Shit! Is it worth obtaining the 'full' versions, or are virtually the same?
__________________
top 10 movies 1. event horizon 2. ju on 3. suspiria 4. the exorcist 5. ringu 6. tcm 7. exorcist III 8. the omen 9. haute tension 10. creep 
|
|
#42
06-19-2011, 01:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
SPOILER ALERT!
As far as I know as Zwoti said earlier in the discussion-the animal cruelty laws have been relaxed last year so in deep red you see the pin going through a lizard. In Inferno you see a cat whacked against something and then a cat eating a mouse. But there may be more-I saw the cut version of Deep Red years ago that was missing 20mins of footage and I've only seen the uncut version of Inferno that came out last year
__________________
"The wind that would have killed us both, it saves my life"-Bel Canto
|
|
#44
06-28-2011, 07:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't either it sounded too ridiculous to even bother with.
__________________
"The wind that would have killed us both, it saves my life"-Bel Canto
|
|
#45
07-08-2011, 05:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought it was very good, but I'm a sick dude !! IMO, it's much better than most of the movie's I've seen lately. prob my favorite of the genre since Martyrs
|
|
#46
07-08-2011, 01:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is actually a quite funny post given the context whoever you REALLY are lol
__________________
"The wind that would have killed us both, it saves my life"-Bel Canto
|
|
#49
10-06-2011, 10:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Having read the reasons for banning it I can say I don't think we'll be missing much, sounds terrible
|
|
#50
10-06-2011, 10:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
My two cents.
Being a Brit, I'm well aware of the BBFC and I think for a film board in a western and somewhat liberalised society, they are very sensitive when it comes to objectionable material. I read a BBC report earlier and it said that it was one of only 11 films that the BBFC ever banned. Now, I'm quite interested in the Video Nasties phenomenon (though I've stated there's a few of the films, I don't think I'll ever watch because they're "too much" such as Cannibal Holocaust) and though most of them are now available uncut, I think there's at least 11 films on that list alone which still aren't distributable legally. Though this is probably more the fact that the films never got resubmitted for classification than for the fact that these films would still be regarded as obscene. And some of the choices for the list were insane (for example banning The Beyond or Inferno and not Salo, which I've heard is pretty nasty) But, I don't believe in censorship, at least not any heavy form of it. Do I find some things hard to stomach or offensive, of course I do, most people do. Do I feel that that should stop other people from watching these films? Certainly not.
|
 |
|
|
