#11
|
||||
|
||||
you right but you have to amite that the original was the best
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How does any sequel ruin its original? I just can't see how that's possible. Even if the sequel is the worst movie ever made, that doesn't take away from the fact the original is still a great movie. I love the original "Scream", one of my all-time favorite movies, but I didn't really care for the sequels as much. However, that doesn't mean that #1 isn't still a damn good movie in my mind.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
It's like what an author (Stephen King, I think) said once in response to someone asking about the bad movies being made off of his books ruining his work.
"It didn't ruin them, they're still there on the shelf." |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
most
most movies shouldnt have a second part
__________________
FUCK OFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I don't mind sequels if they still have a story to tell. That's a large factor why T3 was not needed. Cameron himself said that he was finished telling the story.
__________________
"You think that when you die you go to heaven. You come to US!." |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"You think that when you die you go to heaven. You come to US!." |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
thats cool its your opinion so im not just bitching but i think t2 is the best then t1after that, t3 i thought just sucked.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Now, I'm not saying this as though I hated ALL the sequels, but I do get the feeling that A nightmare on Elm st would have had more impact, and acheived even more of a cult status if it were left on it's own...
|
|
|