| 
			 | 
	||||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 | 
		
			![]()  | 
			 | 
		||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 | 
	||||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
	||||||||||||
| 
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
		
			 | 
	|||||||||||||
| 
			 | 
	||||||||||||||||||||
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				How comfortable are you with ambiguity?
			 
			
			
			One thing I've noticed is that there's a spectrum when it comes to comfort levels with ambiguity as a plot device in horror. Some people prefer the very ambiguous, creeping, growing dread of existential horror like in Bird Box, while others prefer the explicit, in-your-face, "I'm going to kill you right now with this knife I'm holding in my hand"-sort of unambiguous terror like in slashers and gore-fests. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I fall almost completely on the side of the former; I don't want to see what the monster looks like or even know if there's really a monster there at all, I just want to be afraid that there could be a monster and believe it's probably horrible, if so. What about you? 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Check out That Feeling When You Know You're Doomed. It's a collection of short, existential horror stories inspired by the Twilight Zone and H.P. Lovecraft. Learn more here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07S3Z6LK8  
			 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				I'm inclined to agree
			 
			
			
			When you said "ambiguity" I thought you meant something slightly different. I was thinking sort of Kafka's Metamorphosis type stuff where the explanation for how he turned into a giant insect is never there. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	But yeah, I really feel you. The crux of horror is mystery. Imagine if for example the plot of Spiderman really happened. It would be a very scary experience but we don't call this movie a horror. It's an action movie. Horror is about something much less obliging, something much less understandable. It needs to be something that goes beyond our comprehension (at least for the moment). When I was watching "The Double Life of Veronique" I remember being intrigued throughout and then the screen went black. I said out loud "If credits start rolling I am going to be so ticked" and then they did. But Veronique is not a horror movie and I think if I rewatched it I would get it more. I want a horror movie to recreate a sense of helplessness in me and I agree totally, you can't see too much. I'm not saying categorically they should never show things (like what the monster looks like) but if a person want's to see all the viscera from the beginning or have the identities of everything explained (like a lot of people wanted after watching "The hole in the ground") then I think they don't want horror. They want supernatural thrillers or adventure movies. Which is fine. As much as I love movies like Hostel, Evil Dead or The Thing, sometimes when I hear people mention "Slow Burn Horror" I think: "As Opposed to what?"  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I like that.  Something beyond our comprehension, and this makes me think of another feeling that often comes along with horror...the feeling of awe...
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I enjoy books with ambiguity, especially the ending, but there's nothing wrong with horror that's full on. One recent book I read that applies ambiguity well is Cabin at the End of the World by Paul Tremblay.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Tags | 
| horror | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |