Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Upcoming Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 11-27-2006, 12:08 PM
Roderick Usher's Avatar
Roderick Usher Roderick Usher is offline
HDC Sole Survivor!!

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Underneath the Bed
Posts: 7,012
not really a prequel - it's a reboot.

It's all contemporary and it starts off as if there had never been any previous Bond stories. It is restarting the franchise in the same way Batman Begins did.

M is in place before Bond becomes a double-o, she's played by Judi Dench simply to provide a little familiarity and continutity to the series - and she's great in the role.
__________________
"Little, vicious minds abound with anger and revenge, and are incapable of feeling the pleasure of forgiving their enemies."
Earl of Chesterfield

"A man that studieth revenge keeps his own wounds green, which otherwise would heal and do well."
Francis Bacon
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-27-2006, 12:31 PM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roderick Usher View Post
.

M is in place before Bond becomes a double-o, she's played by Judi Dench simply to provide a little familiarity and continutity to the series - and she's great in the role.


i got the impression they were trying to make her look a little younger..
whats with the cleavage !

she is good though .. no suprises there.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-27-2006, 02:52 PM
Prelude95Si's Avatar
Prelude95Si Prelude95Si is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by urgeok View Post
any card game is boring to watch on screen .. and it was the majority of the book .. i thought they did a great job.

i thought the female lead was miscast ..i didnt like her look or delivery (she was pretty - but there was something missing) .. as well as the far more beautiful 'married gal' (she couldnt act but she was gorgeous)

i liked the villian ... very low key and not as cartoonish as what we're used to .. more manacing and real in my eyes.

the shortcomings of this film were so minor to me i overlooked them with no effort.

i didnt find any part of the film slow - i liked the character developement.

it did have a bit of 'lord of the rings-itis' where it kept going whenever you thought it had ended .. but i was enjoying it so i was glad it kept going.

this is the Bond that Ian Fleming wrote ... brutal and cruel.
I agree completely.

I also agree that this is a restart, the overall feel of the film was as though nothing had happened yet in the life of Bond in terms of continuity from the other 20 films. Plus this is the 1st time Bond meets Lighter, in the original Dr. No Bond meet Lighter for the 1st time there. So that kinda also made me think of this being a restart.

Now does anyone whose seen the movie think that they maybe trying bring back SPECTOR? They kept refering to a larger organization. Then there was the guy with the black lens over his glasses which made me think he was Largo from Thunderball but then Bond killed him so I wasn't sure after that.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-27-2006, 04:54 PM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prelude95Si View Post
Now does anyone whose seen the movie think that they maybe trying bring back SPECTOR? .
yeah - thats probably it ... i hope so anyway.
they could remake all the bonds at this point - if they were to follow the books.

except The Spy Who Loved Me ... horrible horrible Bond book.
Not because they tried something new - i have no problem with that - it was just blah.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-27-2006, 05:28 PM
Prelude95Si's Avatar
Prelude95Si Prelude95Si is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by urgeok View Post
yeah - thats probably it ... i hope so anyway.
they could remake all the bonds at this point - if they were to follow the books.

except The Spy Who Loved Me ... horrible horrible Bond book.
Not because they tried something new - i have no problem with that - it was just blah.
I've never read the novels but I read somewhere that the Spy Who Loved Me was the one novel that Ian wouldn't let them make a movie out of, he just let them use the title.

Was the movie better than the novel?

I would love a SPECTOR come back I hated the way SPECTOR was defeated in that it came down to Bolwfield in You Only Live Twice, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, and Diamonds are Forever. Then I hated how he was that little crippled looking guy in You Only Live Twice, I thought he had a better look in Never Say Never even though I hated that movie. I think that was a big copy of Thunderball right?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:11 AM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prelude95Si View Post
I've never read the novels but I read somewhere that the Spy Who Loved Me was the one novel that Ian wouldn't let them make a movie out of, he just let them use the title.

Was the movie better than the novel?

I would love a SPECTOR come back I hated the way SPECTOR was defeated in that it came down to Bolwfield in You Only Live Twice, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, and Diamonds are Forever. Then I hated how he was that little crippled looking guy in You Only Live Twice, I thought he had a better look in Never Say Never even though I hated that movie. I think that was a big copy of Thunderball right?


i liked never say never again .. great score. good to see connery back .. one of my favorite villians ever.

the spy who loved me was co-written with a woman (or so it says)
It takes place in an out of the way motel in new york state just south of the canadian border where a girl who runs the motel is being terrorized by 3 run of the mill criminals .. thats it.

i'm not opposed to him trying something new - and it sounds like it could work - but it doesnt. so in this one case - the movie was better than the book.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-28-2006, 08:37 AM
Prelude95Si's Avatar
Prelude95Si Prelude95Si is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by urgeok View Post
i liked never say never again .. great score. good to see connery back .. one of my favorite villians ever.

the spy who loved me was co-written with a woman (or so it says)
It takes place in an out of the way motel in new york state just south of the canadian border where a girl who runs the motel is being terrorized by 3 run of the mill criminals .. thats it.

i'm not opposed to him trying something new - and it sounds like it could work - but it doesnt. so in this one case - the movie was better than the book.
That does sound preety queer.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-28-2006, 09:01 AM
Vodstok's Avatar
Vodstok Vodstok is offline
Fear scented candle
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The edge of forever
Posts: 13,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roderick Usher View Post
not really a prequel - it's a reboot.

It's all contemporary and it starts off as if there had never been any previous Bond stories. It is restarting the franchise in the same way Batman Begins did.

M is in place before Bond becomes a double-o, she's played by Judi Dench simply to provide a little familiarity and continutity to the series - and she's great in the role.
Verry cool... Which means we may see newer version of some of the old stories then, perhaps a buit more faithful to Ian Flemming's stories...

Hey, and if any of us hate them, there are still 40+ years of bond films to watch and love :)
__________________
Some misguided people decided I was funny enough to pay. See if they're right:
http://www.cracked.com/members/Vodstok/
(I tweet pretty hardcore, too)
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-28-2006, 11:28 PM
roshiq's Avatar
roshiq roshiq is offline
Pirate of Bengal

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 8,691
Wink

Few years ago I read on a magazine that they would like to strat 2 trends in Bond series!! One is for a completely new one & the other one would be the remake of old bond classics and there would be 2 different actor playing the role for the 2 trends!! I personally did'nt take it seriously because that was a foreign magazine with full of gossips & the source was'nt reliable at all. :mad:
But now... after Casino Royale it seems that the magazine probably did some hell of a job~~!!:D
__________________
@Letterboxd
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 AM.