Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror.com Lobby > Horror.com General Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-05-2007, 06:53 AM
tamarag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Women In Horrors

has anyone got any views on how the representation of women in horror movies has changed since the 70s? this could be in slasher, zombie, whatever...do u think they really have changed or just been made more active to satisfy feminists? any replies would be GREAT:p
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2007, 03:04 PM
The STE's Avatar
The STE The STE is offline
The Emperor of America
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dr. Zaius
Posts: 7,670
Send a message via AIM to The STE
Ignoring the fact that being more active IS changing, I think women in horror movies have had it better than the femenists would have us believe. Especially in the 70's, if you were a guy in a slasher movie, you were fucked. The survivor was always a girl. Sometimes a guy would also survive, but never by himself. Yes, one could argue that the surviving girl is always the one who never has sex and is all nice and semi-subserviant, but this would be ignoring the fact that 99% of the time, the people who are having the sex in the movie are acting either stupid or irresponsible about it.
Horror movies nowadays usually have the sub-Sigorney Weaver badass empowered lady type, and while I'm not saying there shouldn't be any badass women in movies, the character(s) is usually cookie cutter and I'm starting to get a little tired of Michelle Rodriguez.

Just be glad SFF isn't here or this would turn into a thread of her bitching up a storm about the vast male conspiracy against anything with ovaries.
__________________

===

WATCH MY MOVIES(UPDATED: 5/7/08, "No Exit")
RING OF HONOR: BEST WRESTLING IN THE WORLD


TOO GOOD FOR THE HDC BATTLE ROYALE
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2007, 03:34 PM
Shazbut's Avatar
Shazbut Shazbut is offline
Alien life form
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sirius C
Posts: 552
I just simply compare the screaming, terrified girly of the 50's with the assertive, almost androgenous, Ripley's of today. (Ironically, an early draft of the script had Ripley as a man).

It's always been about good vs evil - and the hero always won.

Up to the 70's, women were still screaming and hiding behind the men but I think we began to see a slight shift, in that the hero was not going to experience a happy ending. It was better to have a negative ending to a film as opposed to good getting the better of evil.

I dont think the kick ass females today are there to satisfy the feminists - I think it's just a shift in mindset. But regardless of the likes of Sigourney Weaver being able to give us a feasible *female* action hero, we still maintain many men as the iconic hero - our Bruce Willis's, etc.. It just makes a nice change having the woman doing the action bit.

Apart from Sigourney, Geena Davies in "Long Kiss Goodnight" is another prime example.
__________________
Understanding is a 3-edged sword
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2007, 03:06 AM
Zero's Avatar
Zero Zero is offline
whatever gets you through
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a big tree
Posts: 7,871
check out Carol Clover's book _Men, Women and Chainsaws_ - very detailed and smart book about gender and horror!
__________________
Winner HDC Battle Royale I & HDC Battle Royale IV
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 PM.